|
Kamogha...the flood of
sensuality: sunk in sights, in sounds, in smells, in
tastes, in bodily sensations. Sunk because we only look
at externals, we don't look inwardly. People don't look
at themselves, they only look at others. They can see
everybody else but they can't see themselves. It's not
such a difficult thing to do, but it's just that people
don't really try.
For example, look at a
beautiful woman. What does that do to you? As soon as
you see the face you see everything else. Do you see it?
Just look within your mind. What is it like to see a
woman? As soon as the eyes see just a little bit the
mind sees all the rest. Why is it so fast?
It's because you are
sunk in the "water." You are sunk, you think about it,
fantasize about it, are stuck in it. It's just like
being a slave...somebody else has control over you. When
they tell you to sit you've got to sit, when they tell
you to walk you've got to walk...you can't disobey them
because you're their slave. Being enslaved by the senses
is the same. No matter how hard you try you can't seem
to shake it off. And if you expect others to do it for
you, you really get into trouble. You must shake it off
for yourself.
Therefore the Buddha
left the practice of Dhamma, the transcendence of
suffering, up to us. Take nibbana1
for example. The Buddha was thoroughly enlightened, so
why didn't he describe nibbana in detail? Why did
he only say that we should practice and find out for
ourselves. Why is that? Shouldn't he have explained what
nibbana is like?
"The Buddha practiced,
developing the perfections over countless world ages for
the sake of all sentient beings, so why didn't he point
out nibbana so that they all could see it and go
there too?" Some people think like this. "If the Buddha
really knew he would tell us. Why should he keep
anything hidden?"
Actually this sort of
thinking is wrong. We can't see the truth in that way.
We must practice, we must cultivate, in order to see.
The Buddha only pointed out the way to develop wisdom,
that's all. He said that we ourselves must practice.
Whoever practices will reach the goal.
But that path which the
Buddha taught goes against our habits. To be frugal, to
be restrained...we don't really like these things, so we
say, "Show us the way, show us the way to nibbana,
so that those who like it easy like us can go there
too." It's the same with wisdom. The Buddha can't show
you wisdom, it's not something that can be simply handed
around. The Buddha can show the way to develop wisdom,
but whether you develop much or only a little depends on
the individual. Merit and accumulated virtues of people
naturally differ.
Just look at a material
object, such as the wooden lions in front of the hall
here. People come and look at them and can't seem to
agree: one person says, "Oh, how beautiful," while
another says, "How revolting!" It's the one lion, both
beautiful and ugly. Just this is enough to know how
things are.
Therefore the
realization of Dhamma is sometimes slow, sometimes fast.
The Buddha and his disciples were all alike in that they
had to practice for themselves, but even so they still
relied on teachers to advise them and give them
techniques in the practice.
Now, when we listen to
Dhamma we may want to listen until all our doubts are
cleared up, but they'll never be cleared up simply by
listening. Doubt is not overcome simply by listening or
thinking, we must first clean out the mind. To clean out
the mind means to revise our practice. No matter how
long we were to listen to the teacher talk about the
truth we couldn't know or see that truth just from
listening. If we did it would be only through guesswork
or conjecture.
However, even though
simply listening to the Dhamma may not lead to
realization, it is beneficial. There were, in the
Buddha's time, those who realized the Dhamma, even
realizing the highest realization -- arahantship, while
listening to a discourse. But those people were already
highly developed, their minds already understood to some
extent. It's like a football. When a football is pumped
up with air it expands. Now the air in that football is
all pushing to get out, but there's no hole for it to do
so. As soon as a needle punctures the football the air
comes bursting out.
This is the same. The
minds of those disciples who were enlightened while
listening to the Dhamma were like this. As long as there
was no catalyst to cause the reaction this "pressure"
was within them, like the football. The mind was not yet
free because of this very small thing concealing the
truth. As soon as they heard the Dhamma and it hit the
right spot, wisdom arose. They immediately understood,
immediately let go and realized the true Dhamma. That's
how it was. It was easy. The mind uprighted itself. It
changed, or turned, from one view to another. You could
say it was far, or you could say it was very near.
This is something we
must do for ourselves. The Buddha was only able to give
techniques on how to develop wisdom, and so with the
teachers these days. They give Dhamma talks, they talk
about the truth, but still we can't make that truth our
own. Why not? There's a "film" obscuring it. You could
say that we are sunk, sunk in the water. Kamogha
-- the "flood" of sensuality. Bhavogha -- the
"flood" of becoming.
"Becoming" (bhava)
means "the sphere of birth." Sensual desire is born at
sights, sounds, tastes, smells, feelings and thoughts,
identifying with these things. The mind holds fast and
is stuck to sensuality.
Some cultivators get
bored, fed up, tired of the practice and lazy. You don't
have to look very far, just look at how people can't
seem to keep the Dhamma in mind, and yet if they get
scolded they'll hold on to it for ages. They may get
scolded at the beginning of the Rains, and even after
the Rains Retreat has ended they still haven't forgotten
it. Their whole lives they still won't forget it if it
goes down deep enough.
But when it comes to the
Buddha's teaching, telling us to be moderate, to be
restrained, to practice conscientiously...why don't
people take these things to their hearts? Why do they
keep forgetting these things? You don't have to look
very far, just look at our practice here. For example,
establishing standards such as: after the meal while
washing your bowls, don't chatter! Even this much seems
to be beyond people. Even though we know that chattering
is not particularly useful and binds us to
sensuality...people still like talking. Pretty soon they
start to disagree and eventually get into arguments and
squabbles. There's nothing more to it than this.
Now this isn't anything
subtle or refined, it's pretty basic, and yet people
don't seem to really make much effort with it. They say
they want to see the Dhamma, but they want to see it on
their own terms, they don't want to follow the path of
practice. That's as far as they go. All these standards
of practice are skillful means for penetrating to and
seeing the Dhamma, but people don't practice
accordingly.
To say "real practice"
or "ardent practice" doesn't necessarily mean you have
to expend a whole lot of energy -- just put some effort
into the mind, making some effort with all the feelings
that arise, especially those which are steeped in
sensuality. These are our enemies.
But people can't seem to
do it. Every year, as the end of the Rains Retreat
approaches, it gets worse and worse. Some of the monks
have reached the limit of their endurance, the "end of
their tether." The closer we get to the end of the Rains
the worse they get, they have no consistency in their
practice. I speak about this every year and yet people
can't seem to remember it. We establish a certain
standard and in not even a year it's fallen apart.
Almost finished the Retreat and it starts -- the
chatter, the socializing and everything else. It all
goes to pieces. This is how it tends to be.
Those who are really
interested in the practice should consider why this is
so. It's because people don't see the adverse results of
these things.
When we are accepted
into the Buddhist monkhood we live simply. And yet some
of them disrobe to go to the front, where the bullets
fly past them every day -- they prefer it like that.
They really want to go. Danger surrounds them on all
sides and yet they're prepared to go. Why don't they see
the danger? They're prepared to die by the gun but
nobody wants to die developing virtue. Just seeing this
is enough...it's because they're slaves, nothing else.
See this much and you know what it's all about. People
don't see the danger.
This is really amazing,
isn't it? You'd think they could see it but they can't.
If they can't see it even then, then there's no way they
can get out. They're determined to whirl around in
samsara. This is how things are. Just talking about
simple things like this we can begin to understand.
If you were to ask them,
"Why were you born?" They'd probably have a lot of
trouble answering, because they can't see it. They're
sunk in the world of the senses and sunk in becoming
(bhava).2Bhava
is the sphere of birth, our birthplace. To put it
simply, where are beings born from? Bhava is the
preliminary condition for birth. Wherever birth takes
place, that's bhava.
For example, suppose we
had an orchard of apple trees that we were particularly
fond of. That's a bhava for us if we don't
reflect with wisdom. How so? Suppose our orchard
contained a hundred or a thousand apple trees...it
doesn't really matter what kind of trees they are, just
so long as we consider them to be "our own" trees...then
we are going to be "born" as a "worm" in every single
one of those trees. We bore into every one, even though
our human body is still back there in the house, we send
out "tentacles" into every one of those trees.
Now, how do we know that
it's a bhava? It's a bhava (sphere of
existence) because of our clinging to the idea that
those trees are our own, that that orchard is our own.
If someone were to take an ax and cut one of the trees
down, the owner over there in the house "dies" along
with the tree. He gets furious, and has to go and set
things right, to fight and maybe even kill over it. That
quarreling is the "birth." The "sphere of birth" is the
orchard of trees that we cling to as our own. We are
"born" right at the point where we consider them to be
our own, born from that bhava. Even if we had a
thousand apple trees, if someone were to cut down just
one it'd be like cutting the owner down.
Whatever we cling to we
are born right there, we exist right there. We are born
as soon as we "know." This is knowing through
not-knowing: we know that someone has cut down one of
our trees. But we don't know that those trees are not
really ours. This is called "knowing through
not-knowing." We are bound to be born into that
bhava.
Vatta
the wheel of conditioned existence, operates like this.
People cling to bhava, they depend on bhava.
If they cherish bhava, this is birth . And if
they fall into suffering over that same thing, this is
also a birth. As long as we can't let go we are stuck in
the rut of samsara, spinning around like a wheel.
Look into this, contemplate it. Whatever we cling to as
being us or ours, that is a place for birth.
There must be a
bhava, a sphere of birth, before birth can take
place. Therefore the Buddha said, whatever you have,
don't "have" it. Let it be there but don't make it
yours. You must understand this "having" and "not
having," know the truth of them, don't flounder in
suffering.
The place that we were
born from; you want to go back there and be born again,
don't you? All of you monks and novices, do you know
where you were born from? You want to go back there,
don't you? Right there, look into this. All of you
getting ready. The nearer we get to the end of the
retreat the more you start preparing to go back and be
born there.
Really, you'd think that
people could appreciate what it would be like, living in
a person's belly. How uncomfortable would that be? Just
look, merely staying in your kuti for one day is
enough. Shut all the doors and windows and you're
suffocating already. How would it be to lie in a
person's belly for nine or ten months? Think about it.
People don't see the
liability of things. Ask them why they are living, or
why they are born, and they have no idea. Do you still
want to get back in there? Why? It should be obvious but
you don't see it. Why can't you see it? What are you
stuck on, what are you holding onto? Think it out for
yourself.
It's because there is a
cause for becoming and birth. Just take a look at the
preserved baby in the main hall, have you seen it? Isn't
anybody alarmed by it? No, no-one's alarmed by it. A
baby lying in its mother's belly is just like that
preserved baby. And yet you want to make more of those
things, and even want to get back and soak in there
yourself. Why don't you see the danger of it and the
benefit of the practice?
You see? That's
bhava. The root is right there, it revolves around
that. The Buddha taught to contemplate this point.
People think about it but still don't see. They're all
getting ready to go back there again. they know that it
wouldn't be very comfortable in there, to put their
necks in the noose is really uncomfortable, they still
want to lay their heads in there. Why don't they
understand this? This is where wisdom comes in, where we
must contemplate.
When I talk like this
people say, "If that's the case then everybody would
have to become monks...and then how would the world be
able to function?" You'll never get everybody to become
monks, so don't worry. The world is here because of
deluded beings, so this is no trifling matter.
I first became a novice
at the age of nine. I started practicing from way back
then. But in those days I didn't really know what it was
all about. I found out when I became a monk. Once I
became a monk I became so wary. The sensual pleasures
people indulged in didn't seem like so much fun to me. I
saw the suffering in them. It was like seeing a
delicious banana which I knew was very sweet but which I
also knew to be poisoned. No matter how sweet or
tempting it was, if I ate it I would die. I considered
in this way every time...every time I wanted to "eat a
banana" I would see the "poison" steeped inside, and so
eventually I could withdraw my interest from those
things. Now at this age, such things are not at all
tempting.
Some people don't see
the "poison'; some see it but still want to try their
luck. "If your hand is wounded don't touch poison, it
may seep into the wound."
I used to consider
trying it out as well. When I had lived as a monk for
five or six years, I thought of the Buddha. He practiced
for five or six years and was finished, but I was still
interested in the worldly life, so I thought of going
back to it: "Maybe I should go and "build the world" for
a while, I would gain some experience and learning. Even
the Buddha had his son, Rahula. Maybe I'm being too
strict?..."
I sat and considered
this for some time, until I realized: "Yes, well, that's
all very fine, but I'm just afraid that this 'Buddha'
won't be like the last one," a voice in me said, "I'm
afraid this 'Buddha' will just sink into the mud, not
like the last one." And so I resisted those worldly
thoughts.
From my sixth or seventh
rains retreat up until the twentieth, I really had to
put up a fight. These days I seem to have run out of
bullets, I've been shooting for a long time. I'm just
afraid that you younger monks and novices have still got
so much ammunition, you may just want to go and try out
your guns. Before you do, consider carefully first.
Speaking of sensual
desire, it's hard to give up. It's really difficult to
see it as it is. We must use skillful means. Consider
sensual pleasures as like eating meat which gets stuck
in your teeth. Before you finish the meal you have to
find a toothpick to pry it out. When the meat comes out
you feel some relief for a while, maybe you even think
that you won't eat any more meat. But when you see it
again you can't resist it. You eat some more and then it
gets stuck again. When it gets stuck you have to pick it
out again, which gives some relief once more, until you
eat some more meat...That's all there is to it. Sensual
pleasures are just like this, no better than this. When
the meat gets stuck in your teeth there's discomfort.
You take a toothpick and pick it out and experience some
relief. There's nothing more to it than this sensual
desire...The pressure builds up and up until you let a
little bit out...Oh! That's all there is to it. I don't
know what all the fuss is about.
I didn't learn these
things from anybody else, they occurred to me in the
course of my practice. I would sit in meditation and
reflect on sensual pleasure as being like a red ants'
nest.3
Someone takes a piece of wood and pokes the nest until
the ants come running out, crawling down the wood and
into their faces, biting their eyes and ears. And yet
they still don't see the difficulty they are in.
However it's not beyond
our ability. In the teaching of the Buddha it is said
that if we've seen the harm of something, no matter how
good it may seem to be, we know that it's harmful.
Whatever we haven't yet seen the harm of, we just think
it's good. If we haven't yet seen the harm of anything
we can't get out of it.
Have you noticed? No
matter how dirty it may be people like it. This kind of
"work" isn't clean but you don't even have to pay people
to do it, they'll gladly volunteer. With other kinds of
dirty work, even if you pay a good wage people won't do
it, but this kind of work they submit themselves to
gladly, you don't even have to pay them. It's not that
it's clean work, either, it's dirty work. Yet why do
people like it? How can you say that people are
intelligent when they behave like this? Think about it.
Have you ever noticed
the dogs in the monastery ground here? There are packs
of them. They run around biting each other, some of them
even getting maimed. In another month or so they'll be
at it. As soon as one of the smaller ones gets into the
pack the bigger ones are at him...out he comes yelping,
dragging his leg behind him. But when the pack runs on
he hobbles on after it. He's only a little one, but he
thinks he'll get his chance one day. They bite his leg
for him and that's all he gets for his trouble. For the
whole of the mating season he may not even get one
chance. You can see this for yourself in the monastery
here.
These dogs when they run
around howling in packs...I figure if they were humans
they'd be singing songs! They think it's such great fun
they're singing songs, but they don't have a clue what
it is that makes them do it, they just blindly follow
their instincts.
Think about this
carefully. If you really want to practice you should
understand your feelings. For example, among the monks,
novices or laypeople, who should you socialize with? If
you associate with people who talk a lot they induce you
to talk a lot also. Your own share is already enough,
theirs is even more...put them together and they
explode!
People like to socialize
with those who chatter a lot and talk of frivolous
things. They can sit and listen to that for hours. When
it comes to listening to Dhamma, talking about practice,
there isn't much of it to be heard. Like when giving a
Dhamma talk: As soon as I start off..."Namo Tassa
Bhagavato'4
...they're all sleepy already. They don't take in the
talk at all. When I reach the "Evam" they all open their
eyes and wake up. Every time there's a Dhamma talk
people fall asleep. How are they going to get any
benefit from it?
Real Dhamma cultivators
will come away from a talk feeling inspired and
uplifted, they learn something. Every six or seven days
the teacher gives another talk, constantly boosting the
practice.
This is your chance, now
that you are ordained. There's only this one chance, so
take a close look. Look at things and consider which
path you will choose. You are independent now. Where are
you going to go from here? You are standing at the
crossroads between the worldly way and the Dhamma way.
Which way will you choose? You can take either way, this
is the time to decide. The choice is yours to make. If
you are to be liberated it is at this point.
Notes
1.
Nibbana -- the state of liberation from all
conditioned states.
2.
The Thai word for bhava -- "pop"
-- would have been a familiar term to Ajahn Chah's
audience. It is generally understood to mean "Sphere of
rebirth." Ajahn Chah's usage of the word here is
somewhat unconventional, emphasizing a more practical
application of the term.
3.
Both the red ants and their eggs are used for food in
North East Thailand, so that such raids on their nests
were not so unusual.
4.
The first line of the traditional Pali words
of homage to the Buddha, recited before giving a formal
Dhamma talk. Evam is the traditional Pali word
for ending a talk.
Copyright © 1992 The
Sangha, Wat Pah Nanachat
Copyright © 1999 Wat
Pah Nanachat
|