Dharma Avenue Home | Avenues


The Masters of Maya

Fa Shen Shakya

http://hsuyun.org/Dharma/zbohy/Literature/essays/fss/masters2.html (Oct 2005)

 

September 18, 2004
(Revised from the first edition published in 1998)    

In the beginning there was nothing, nor was anything lacking.
The paper was blank. We pick up the paint brush and create the scene...
The landscape, the wind whipping water into waves.
Everything depends upon the stroke of our brush.
      -- Master Hsu Yun

Some thoughts concerning the nature of reality have teased my mind ever since I first read the following statement by Werner Heisenberg:

Werner Heisenberg, one of the Twentieth Century's greatest minds in physics, turned scientific community upside down when he convincingly demonstrated that an observer affects what is observed. In 1927 he wrote: "If one wants to be clear about what is meant by "position of an object," for example of an electron..., then one has to specify definite experiments by which the 'position of an electron' can be measured; otherwise this term has no meaning at all. "
 
      --Heisenberg, in uncertainty paper, 1927

"... we have to remember that what we observe is not nature in itself but nature exposed to our method of questioning."

I read this many years ago and its implications are to me both mystical and magical. It would seem that we are not as much observers of an objective reality that exists "out-there", as we are the creators of a subjective reality that exists "in-here". Let me elaborate a bit.

The tools with which we are born and with which we come to know the world are our five sense organs - our eyes, ears, nose, tongue and skin. We often say that our eyes look out upon the world. But what intrigues me is that it isn't so much our eyes looking out as what is projected onto us, followed by our interpretation of what we think we have just sensed.

Let's take our simple observation of a house plant. Light photons of varying frequencies emanate from the sun and bombard the leaf of the plant. Many of these photons pass through the surface of the leaf and are absorbed by it. The frequencies of light which the leaf does not absorb bounce off, and into our observing eyes. This light passes through the lenses of our eyes where it is magnified, inverted, and then projected internally onto a matrix of receptors called the retina. There, a cascade of biochemical and electrochemical events soon follow, translating these incoming signals into a format that allows our mind to come up with the color green and a contrasted image of the leaf. We use the historical database of our minds to compare this leaf to others that we have known before. We quickly ascertain that the leaf is safe, it is not poison ivy.

Being curious creatures, we want to know more about this leaf, and so we gently touch it to find that its top surface feels smooth, and its bottom feels rough. We hear how the leaf sounds when a breeze comes by causing it to rub against other leaves. We can smell and even taste the leaf if we want. Ultimately, we use all our faculties to create a fuller image of it in our mind. This Maya-leaf seems so real.

Our first impression is that this leaf sensation exists as an external, independent and fixed reality because that's what our senses would have us believe. But our five senses were probably never meant to know the truth of "what is". They seem to have evolved to allow us to survive, procreate and to help our offspring to do the same. But still we want to know more.

So, we build microscopes to "see" near and spectrometers that can "smell" and "taste" the contents of gas vapors and liquids in the leaf. We have devices that can "feel" surfaces for temperature and pressure, and we can use sound meters to detect and "hear" loudness and pitch. Now we are on a scientific path to the discovery of this Maya-leaf in its totality. We think that by creating more tools of increasing sensitivity that we will come to know "what is", the essence of that leaf.

But this assumption about reality seems to be at odds with our understanding of quantum science. What we eventually find on our scientific path though, is the discovery that the underlying sub-atomic fabric of our world does not behave in a way that our minds can easily fathom. Fixed points of reality do not really exist in the pre-observational external world. What does appear to exist are only quantum probabilities everywhere. Upon observation, these probabilities collapse and flash! -- we create and affect the nature of things simply by our awareness of them. Particles seem to scintillate in and out of existence before our eyes. It is as though we are creating the world as we go, as we experience it. We take input data and create a model of what we then assume is an external and objective reality.

But reality isn't actually known through our observations, or senses. Instead, it would appear that all observers are much more like artists. We dip our mind's brush in the bucket of quantum probabilities around us to create our world. It would seem that we are all Masters of Maya from the very beginning.


 

Download this article (Format: Microsoft Word / Size: 47kb)

 
 

E-Mail This Article Link To Your Friend

 
 
 
Acknowledgementt / Donations / Contact Us / Strategic Partners

Copyright © 2004 [Dharma Avenue]. All rights reserved.
Revised: 10/31/05.