All people
in the world, including the Thai people, are now in
the same situation as were the Kalama people of
Kesaputtanigama, India, during the time of the
Buddha. Their village was in a place through which
many religious teachers passed. Each of these
teachers taught that his personal doctrine was the
only truth, and that all others before and after him
were wrong. The Kalamas could not decide which
doctrine they should accept and follow. The Buddha
once came to their village and the Kalamas brought
up this problem with him: that they did not know
which teacher to believe. So the Buddha taught them
what is now known as the Kalama Sutta, which
we will examine here.
Nowadays,
worldly people can study many different approaches
to economic, social, and technological development.
The universities teach just about everything. Then,
regarding spiritual matters, here in Thailand alone
we have so many teachers, so many interpretations of
the Buddha's teachings, and so many meditation
centers that nobody knows which teaching to accept
or which practice to follow. Thus it can be said
that we have fallen into the same position as the
Kalamas were in.
The Buddha
taught them, and us, not to accept or believe
anything immediately. He gave ten basic conditions
to beware of in order to avoid becoming the
intellectual slave of anyone, even of the Buddha
himself. This principle enables us to know how to
choose the teachings which are truly capable of
quenching suffering (dukkha). The ten
examples which the Buddha gave in the Kalama
Sutta follow.
1. Ma
anussavena : do not accept and believe just
because something has been passed along and retold
through the years. Such credulity is a
characteristic of brainless people, or "sawdust
brains," such as those in Bangkok who once believed
that there would be disasters for the people born in
the "ma years" (those years of the
traditional twelve year Thai calendar whose names
begin with "ma," namely, years five through
eight--small snake, big snake. horse, and goat).
2. Ma
paramparaya : do not believe just because some
practice has become traditional. People tend to
imitate what others do and then pass the habit
along, as in the story of the rabbit frightened by
the fallen bael fruit *(The same story as "Chicken
Little"). The other animals saw it running at
full-strength, and then so frightened and excited
each other that they ran after it. Most of them
tripped and fell, broke their necks, or tumbled to
death off cliffs. Any vipassana practice that
is done in imitations of others, as a mere
tradition, leads to similar results.
3. Ma
itikiraya : do not accept and believe merely
because of the reports and news spreading far and
wide through one's village, or even throughout the
world. Only fools are susceptible to such "rumors,"
for they refuse to exercise their own intelligence.
4. Ma
pitakasampadanena : do not accept and believe
just because something is cited in a pitaka.
The word "pitaka, " which is used for the
Buddhist scriptures, means anything written or
inscribed upon any suitable writing material.
Memorized teachings which are passed on orally
should not be confused with pitaka. Pitakas
are a certain kind of conditioned thing which are
under humanity's control. They can be created,
improved, and changed by human hands. So we cannot
trust every letter and word in them. We need to use
our powers of discrimination to see how those words
can be applied to the quenching of suffering. The
various schools of Buddhism all have their own
canons, among which there are discrepancies.
5. Ma
takkahetu : do not believe just because
something fits with the reasoning of logic (takka).
This is merely one branch of study used to try to
figure out the truth. Takka, what we call
"logics," can go wrong if its data or its methods
are incorrect.
6. Ma
nayahetu : do not believe just because something
is correct on the grounds of naya (deductive
and inductive reasoning) alone. These days, naya
is called "philosophy." In Thailand, we translate
the word "philosophy" as "prajna, " which the
Indian people cannot accept because "naya" is
only one point of view. It is not the highest or
absolute wisdom which they call "panna" or "prajna."
Naya, or nyaya, is merely a branch of
thought which reasons on the basis of assumption or
hypotheses. It can be incorrect if the reasoning or
choice of assumptions is inappropriate.
7. Ma
akaraparivitakkena : do not believe or accept
just because something appeals to one's common
sense, which is merely snap judgements based on
one's tendencies of thought. We like using this
approach so much that it becomes habitual. Boastful
philosophers like to use this method a great deal
and consider it to be clever.
8. Ma
ditthinijjhanakkhantiya : do not believe just
because something stands up to or agrees with one's
preconceived opinions and theories. Personal views
can be wrong. or our methods of experiment and
verification might be incorrect, and then will not
lead to the truth. Accepting what fits our theories
may seem to be a scientific approach, but actually
can never be so, since its proofs and experiments
are inadequate.
9. Ma
bhabbarupataya : do not believe just because the
speaker appears believable. Outside appearances and
the actual knowledge inside a person can never be
identical. We often find that speakers who appear
credible on the outside say incorrect and foolish
things. Nowadays, we must be wary of computers
because the programmers who feed them data and
manipulate them may feed in the wrong information or
use them incorrectly. Do not worship computers so
much, for doing so goes against this principle of
the Kalama Sutta.
10. Ma
samano no garu ti : do not believe just because
the samana or preacher, the speaker, is "our
teacher." The Buddha's purpose regarding this
important point is that no one should be the
intellectual slave of someone else, not even of the
Buddha himself. The Buddha emphasized this point
often, and there were disciples, such as the
venerable Sariputta, who confirmed this practice.
They did not believe the Buddha's words immediately
upon hearing them, but believed only after
adequately considering the advice and putting it to
the test of practice. See for yourselves whether
there is any other religious teacher in the world
who has given this highest freedom to his disciples
and audiences! Thus in Buddhism there is no dogmatic
system, there is no pressure to believe without the
right to examine and decide for oneself. This is the
greatest special quality of Buddhism which keeps its
practitioners from being the intellectual slaves of
anyone, as explained above. We Thais should not
volunteer to follow the West as slavishly as we are
doing now. Intellectual and spiritual freedom is
best.
The ten
examples of the Kalama Sutta are a surefire
defense against intellectual dependence or not being
one's own person: that is, neglecting one's own
intelligence and wisdom in dealing with what one
hears and listens to, what is called in Dhamma
language paratoghosa ("sound of others").
When listening to anything, one should give it
careful attention and full scrutiny. If there is
reason to believe what has been heard and it results
in the genuine quenching of suffering, then one
finally may believe it one-hundred percent.
The
principle of the Kalama Sutta is appropriate
for everyone, everywhere, every era, and every world
-even for the world of devas (gods). Nowadays
the world has been shrunk by superb communications.
Information can be exchanged easily and rapidly.
People can receive new knowledge from every
direction and corner of the globe. In the process,
they don't know what to believe and, therefore, are
in the same position as the Kalamas once were.
Indeed, it is the Kalama Sutta which will be
their refuge. Please give it the good attention and
study it deserves. Consider it the greatest good
fortune that the Buddha taught the Kalama Sutta.
It is a gift for everyone in the world. Only people
who are overly stupid will be unable to benefit from
this advice of the Buddha.
The
Kalama Sutta is to be used by people of all
ages. Even children can apply its principles in
order to be children of awakening (bodhi),
rather than children of ignorance (avijja).
Parents should teach and train their children to
know how to understand the words and instructions
they receive, to see how reasonable the words are
and what kind of results will come from them. When
parents teach or tell their children anything, the
children should understand and see the benefits of
practicing what they are told. For example, when a
child is told not to take heroin, that child should
believe not merely because of fear. Rather, seeing
the results of taking heroin, the child fears them
and then willingly refuses the drug on her or his
own.
None of the
items in the Kalama Sutta state that children
should never believe anyone, should never listen to
anyone. They all state that children, and everyone
else, should listen and believe only after having
seen the real meaning of something and the
advantages they will receive from such belief and
its subsequent practice. When a teacher teaches
something, having the children see the reason behind
the teaching won't make the children obstinate. For
the obstinate ones, gently add a bit of the stick
and let them think things over again. Children will
understand the principle of the Kalama Sutta
more and more as they grow up. They will complete
all ten items themselves as they become fully mature
adults, if we train children by this standard.
A
scientific world such as today's will be able to
accept gladly all ten tenets of the Kalama Sutta
as being in line with the scientific method and
approach. There is not the least contradiction
between the principles of science and those of the
Kalama Sutta. Even the eighth item, which
states that one should not accept something just
because it agrees with one's own preconceived
theories, does not contradict scientific principles.
True scientists emphasize experimental verification,
not their own concepts, opinions, and reasoning, as
their main criterion for acctepting something as
true. Due to these standards of the Kalama Sutta,
Buddhism will meet the expectations and needs of
true scientists.
If one follows the principle of the
Kalama Sutta, one will have independent
knowledge and reason with which to understand the
meaning and truth of ideas and propositions heard
for the first time. For example, when one hears that
greed, hatred, and delusion are dangerous and evil,
one understands thoroughly and instantly, because
one already knows through personal experience what
these thing are like. One believes in oneself rather
than in the speaker. The way of practice is the same
in other cases. If a statement is about something
one has never seen or known before, one should try
to understand or get to know it first. Then one can
consider whether or not to accept the newly received
teaching or advice. One must not accept something
just because one believes in the speaker. One should
take one's time, even if it means dying before
finding out. The Kalama Sutta can protect one
from becoming the intellectual slave of others, even
on the highest levels.
There's a
problem everytime a new kind of medicine comes out
and gets advertised up and down all over the place.
Should we offer ourselves as guinea pigs to test it,
out of belief in the advertisements? Or should we
wait until we have sufficient reason to try just a
little of it first, to see if it truly gives good
results, before fully relying on it? We should
respond to new statements and teachings as we
respond to new medicines, by depending on the
principles in the Kalama Sutta as a true
refuge.
The
Kalama Sutta requires us to have wisdom before
having faith. If one wants to have faith come first,
then let it be the faith which begins with wisdom,
not faith which comes from ignorance. The same holds
true in the principle of the Noble Eightfold Path:
take wisdom or right understanding as the starting
point, then let faith grow out of that wisdom or
right understanding. Thai is the only safe approach.
We ought never to believe blindly immediately upon
hearing something, nor should we be forced to
believe out of fear, bribery, and the like.
The world nowadays is so overwhelmed by the
power of advertising that most people have become
its slaves. It can make people pull out their
wallets to buy things they don't need to eat, don't
need to have, and don't need to use. It's so
commonplace that we absolutely must offer the
principle of the Kalama Sutta to our human
comrades of this era. Propaganda is much more
harmful than ordinary advertising or what is called
paratoghosa in Pali. Even with ordinary
advertising, we must depend on the principle of the
Kalama Sutta, to say nothing of needing this
principle to deal with outright propaganda, which is
full of intentional deceptions. So we can say that
the Kalarna Sutta is beneficial even in
solving economic problems.
I ask you
all to consider, investigate, and test whether there
is found anywhere greater spiritual freedom than is
found in the Kalama Sutta. If someone says
that Buddhism is a religion of freedom, can there be
any reason to dispute or oppose that statement? Does
this world which is intoxicated with freedom really
know or have freedom in line with the principle of
the Kalama Sutta? Is the lack of such freedom
caused by blind ignorance and indifference regarding
the Kalama Sutta? Some people even claim that
it teaches us not to believe or listen to anything.
Moreover, some actually say that the Buddha preached
this sutta only for the Kalamas there at that
time. Why don't we open our eyes and take notice
that people nowadays have become intellectual
slaves, that they have lost their freedom much more
than those Kalamas in the time of the Buddha? Human
friends, fellow worshippers of freedom, I ask you to
consider carefully the essence and aim of the
Kalama Sutta and the Buddha's intention in
teaching it. Then, your Buddhist quality of
awakening will grow fat and robust, rather than
skinny and weak. Don't go foolishly hating and
fearing the Kalama Sutta. The word "Thai"
means "freedom." What kind of freedom are you going
to bring to our "Thainess"? Or what kind of Thainess
is fitting and proper for the Thainess of
Budithists, the disciples of the Buddha?
Now let us
look further to see the hidden benefits and
advantages in the Kalama Sutta. The sutta,
can help us to avoid the tactless and narrow-minded
talk which leads to violent clashes and disputes.
For example, it is foolish to set up an unalterable
rule for all families regarding who, husband or
wife, will be the front legs and who the hind legs
of the elephant. It all depends on the conditions
and circumstances of each specific family. According
to the principles in the Kalama Sutta and the
law of conditionality (idappaccayata), we
only can say which roles are appropriate for whom
depending on the circumstances of each individual
family. Do not speak one-sidedly and go against
natural principles.
Regarding abortion, people argue until
black and red in the face about whether or not it
should be done, without investigating to find out in
which cases it should and in which cases it should
not. Once we follow the principles of the Buddhist
way of reasoning, each situation itself will tell as
what is proper and what is not. Please stop
insisting on onesided positions.
In the case
of meat-eating versus vegetarianism, people blindly
argue for one extreme or the other. The problem is
that people are attached to regarding food as either
meat or as vegetable. For Buddhists, there is
neither meat nor vegetables; there are only elements
in nature. Whether the eater or the eaten, it's all
merely natural elements. The situations where we
should eat meat and the circumstance in which we
shouldn't can be discerned by using the principle of
the Kalama Sutta. For just this reason, the
Buddha never decisively said to eat only meat or
only vegetables, to not eat meat or not eat
vegetables. To speak so carelessly is not the way of
Buddhists.
To say that
democracy is always and absolutely good is to speak
with one's head in the sand. Those who insist on it
haven't considered that a democracy of selfish
people is worse than a dictatorship under an
unselfish person who rules for the sake of Dhamma
and justice. A democracy of selfish people means
freedom to use their selfishness in a most
frightening and awful manner. Consequently, problems
drag on endlessly among those people who have a
democracy of selfishness. Stop saying that democracy
is absolutely good or that dictatorship is
absolutely good. Instead, stick to the principle
that both will be good if they are based in Dhamma.
Each population should choose whichever system suits
the particular circumstances which it faces.
To say that
the Prime Minister exclusively must be an elected
member of parliament, and never someone who the
people haven't chosen directly, is to babble as if
deaf and blind* (This issue has been a dangerous
point of contention between the military and
progressive politicians, which has led to coup
attempts). Really, we must look to see how the
situation ought to be and what the causes and
conditions are, then act correctly according to the
law of conditionality. This is the true Buddhist
way, befitting the fact that Buddhism embodies
democracy in the form of dhammic socialism.
Therefore, the election of members of parliament,
the establishment of a government, the structuring
of the political system, and even the course of
social and economic development should be carried
out using the principle of the Kalama Sutta.
Please consider each example. You soon will discover
the fact that we must rely upon the principle of the
Kalama Sutta.
More than ever the modern world needs the
Kalama Sutta as its basic operating
principle. The world is spinning fast with the
defilements of humanity. It is shrinking due to
better transportation and communications. And it is
about to self-destruct because proper awareness,
intelligence, and wisdom are lacking. Under the
power of defilement, the world is worshipping
materialism, sex and luxury, because it lacks
standards like that of the Kalama Sutta. No
one knows how to make choices in line with its
principle. Consequently, the world is wholly unfit
for peace, while increasing in crime and other
harmful evils every moment. Let's eliminate all
these problems and evils by relying on the Kalama
Sutta as our standard. So let's yell at the top
of our lungs, "Help! Kalama Sutta, help us!"
In conclusion, the Kalama Sutta
never forbids us to believe in anything; it merely
implores us to believe with independent intelligence
and wisdom. It never forbids us to listen to
anything; it merely asks us to listen without
letting our intelligence and wisdom become enslaved.
Furthermore, it helps us to be able to think,
consider, investigate, and decide with great
subtlety and precision, so that we can find golden
needles in haystacks as huge as mountains.
Please come, Kalama Sutta! Come
invest yourself in the hearts and minds of all
Buddhists, of all human beings, in this modern
world.
Kalama Sutta, help us!