|
THE VIPASSANA
NEWSLETTER Vol. 15, No.
9: 18 September 2005
THE DHAMMAGIRI
EDITION
WORDS OF DHAMMA
|
Phutthassa lokadhammehi
cittam yassa na kampati;
asokam virajam khemam,
etam mangalamuttamam.
-Khuddaka patha 5.12, Mangala Sutta |
When faced with the vicissitudes of life,
one's mind is unshaken,
sorrowless, stainless, secure-
this is the highest blessing. |
(The
following is a translation of Lokaguru Buddha' by S. N.
Goenka published by VRI in December 2003.
It has been
condensed for the Vipassana Newsletter.)
What
knowledge did Gotama the Buddha have of the difficulties
and complexities of household life? As a prince, he
renounced the household life immediately after the birth
of his son, Rahula, and lived the life of a homeless
recluse. He did not live as a householder himself, so
how could he teach others about the duties of household
life? Since the Buddha lived the life of a recluse for
forty-five years, he understood the problems of recluses
very well and so his teaching was very useful for them.
His only teaching to householders was that they should
abandon the bondage of household life and become monks
or nuns. Consequently, a large number of householders
became recluses. So, by following his teaching,
householders may become good recluses but they can never
become exemplary householders.
Many people
in India harbour this misconception about the Buddha. I
too was a victim of this delusion for many years. At the
age of 31, I came in contact with the beneficial
technique of Vipassana that had been taught by the
Buddha. I was immensely benefited by it. Nobody asked me
to become a bhikkhu (monk).
My revered
teacher, Sayagyi U Ba Khin, was an ideal householder.
Sayagyi U Ba Khin's teacher was also a householder and
millions of people in Myanmar who are followers of the
Buddha are householders. Bhikkhus make up less than one
percent of the population of Myanmar.
After
benefiting from Vipassana and finding it completely
faultless, I began studying the original words of the
Buddha. I discovered that although the Buddha had given
many discourses to bhikkhus on living ideal lives as
recluses, he had given several discourses to
householders on living ideal lives as householders. And
all his discourses on meditation were applicable and
beneficial to both.
So it is
totally false to say that the Buddha was a teacher of
bhikkhus alone. His teaching was for all: householders
and recluses, men and women, kings and paupers, the
wealthy and the poor, scholars and the illiterate,
children and the elderly-speaking any language and of
any country. Truly, the Buddha was a World Teacher.
Prince
Siddhattha married at the age of 16 and left the
household life at the age of 29. During those 13 years,
he must have experienced many of the complexities of
household life. After he became the Buddha, he came in
contact with a large number of people, which exposed him
to many more issues about household life.
After
attaining enlightenment, the perfection with which this
great person understood the difficulties of household
life and offered practical solutions to people, is
unparalleled in human history. The discourses that the
Buddha gave to householders are not just for the
followers of a particular religion but for everyone.
One who
makes even a cursory study of the Buddha's discourses
will appreciate how beneficial they are for
householders.
A
householder understands that the experience of the
highest happiness is possible only by transcending all
the suffering of the worldly life and attaining nibbana.
But on the journey to the final goal, it is possible to
face the vicissitudes of daily life with an equanimous
mind. Vipassana meditators learn to progress in Dhamma
while carrying out their worldly responsibilities. By
practising Vipassana regularly, a good householder
realizes from experience that living a wholesome life
results in happiness and harmony, not only for oneself,
but also for others.
A Vipassana
meditator begins to understand the eternal law of
nature, of cause and effect, not merely at the
devotional or intellectual level but also at the
experiential level. As the seed is, so the fruit will
be. As the action is, so the result will be. Good deeds
will yield sweet fruits; bad deeds will yield bitter
fruits. Whether one believes in this eternal law of
nature or not, one's existence is bound by these laws.
If a person falls from a height, he may break his limbs
or lose his life, even if he does not believe in the law
of gravity.
Whoever
practises this scientific technique taught by the
Buddha-whether a recluse or a householder-begins to
clearly understand the law of kamma, the law of cause
and effect. One understands, My present circumstances
are the cumulative result of my past and present kammas.
I am responsible for my present stock of kammas. No one
else can help me to escape its consequences.
We are
responsible for our happiness or unhappiness now and in
the future. Whether we accept or reject this law of
cause and effect, the results will still follow
according to this law.
The Buddha
gave the beneficial technique of Vipassana to enable the
ordinary householder to become an exemplary individual
by developing morality, concentration of mind, and
wisdom. Society changes for the better only when
individuals change for the better. The greatness of
society depends on the greatness of individuals. The
Buddha gave a practical teaching to enable the
individual and the community to live an ideal life, and
showed the way for the development of an ideal human
society.
Three
Unwholesome Practices:
At the time
of the Buddha, three kinds of unwholesome practices were
widespread, which caused immense harm to society.
1. Animal
sacrifice: Initially, satvika yajnas were wholesome
ceremonial offerings. During these yajnas, the ruler as
well as the rich distributed wealth to the needy.
However, tempted by false assurances of gaining heaven
after death, the practice of animal sacrifice was added
to these yajnas. People strayed from the noble quality
of natural compassion towards all creatures.
With great
compassion, the Buddha opposed this wrong practice that
had become prevalent in society. During his lifetime,
the rulers, merchants and priests gradually stopped this
cruel practice of animal sacrifice. Within a few
centuries after the Buddha, this unwholesome practice
that had been customary in the name of yajna ended
completely. However, even in present times, animals are
sacrificed to please a god or goddess in some parts of
India.
2. Human
slavery: During the time of the Buddha, rearing animals
and selling them to the butcher was widespread. The
Buddha exhorted householders not to practise this wrong
livelihood. Even worse was the inhuman practice of
enslaving people and selling them. Sometimes people
bought young women as slaves for immoral purposes. In
the literature of those days, we find many accounts of
male and female slaves, along with servants and
attendants, in the houses of rulers and wealthy
householders. We also find accounts of ornamented cows
and female slaves being given as alms or gifts. How
could anyone take care of so many slaves? Therefore,
they were sold, and thus, the slave trade flourished.
The Buddha prohibited this livelihood for householders,
and as a result, this practice of slavery was greatly
reduced, and later ended completely. However, the new
incarnation of slavery in the form of bonded labour
remains, and is yet to be eradicated.
3. Caste
System: The third harmful practice was discrimination
based on birth. A person living a totally immoral life
was considered to be pious and of high status because he
was born in a particular caste. Similarly, a person
living a moral life was considered to be inferior, of
low status or even an untouchable because of birth in a
particular caste. When caste was given so much
importance, living a moral life became secondary.
The Buddha
worked tirelessly to get rid of the harm caused to
Dhamma by this social evil and was successful to a great
extent. He explained that one who is born of a human
mother will be a human, not an animal or bird or
reptile. If he is immoral, corrupt, wicked, he is an
outcast; if he is moral, virtuous, righteous, he is
worthy of respect. A person who does immoral deeds
should be considered as inferior and an outcast; if the
same person develops wisdom and becomes moral and
righteous, he should be respected.
Similarly it
is wrong to consider an immoral person to be of high
status merely because he is wealthy. The only yardstick
for high status and respect in society should be whether
one is living a life of Dhamma. For a householder, it is
essential to earn a living honestly by working hard and
with intelligence. It is equally important to live an
ethical life and to make proper use of wealth that one
has earned. This alone can make human life successful
and meaningful.
Unfortunately, within a few centuries after the Buddha,
the dangerous snake of casteism again raised its head
and has entangled the entire society in its destructive
coils. Centuries later, India is still suffering from
the adverse effects of this poison. If the Buddha's
teaching, which gave all importance to moral conduct had
been followed, the state of the country would have been
completely different.
The Buddha
opposed animal sacrifice in the name of Dhamma,
discrimination based on birth, and trade of slaves as
well as of animals. The eradication of these three evils
was essential for the re-establishment of Dhamma then
and is equally necessary today. For an ideal household
life and an ideal human society, it is essential to have
compassion towards all creatures and to have equality
among all people. The teaching of the Buddha to
householders, for the establishment of an exemplary
human society, is an invaluable gift for the entire
world.
Human beings
may make claims of supremacy over earth, water and sky
but as long as they do not establish mastery over their
own minds, they remain defeated. The Buddha has taught
an effective technique that can be used to gain mastery
over oneself. Practising Vipassana, each individual can
gain insight into their own nature, establish mastery
over their own mind, and reform their undisciplined
nature, thus benefitting themselves and others. This is
the greatness of the Buddha's universal teaching to
householders.
Emperor
Asoka and national security
Two hundred
years after the Buddha, an exemplary emperor of India,
Emperor Asoka, strongly supported the universal teaching
of the Buddha. This enabled the formation of an ideal
society. The influence of the Buddha's teaching spread
not only to the neighbouring kingdoms, but also to
distant lands. Besides, Emperor Asoka presented an
illustrious example of an ideal ruler, one who did not
attack weaker neighbouring kingdoms merely to fulfil his
imperial ambitions.
However,
Emperor Asoka was constantly alert about the security of
his empire and maintained a powerful defensive army. He
protected and nurtured his subjects like his own
children. This glorious example of the ideal way to
fulfil the duties of a ruler was exemplified by him
because he applied the practical teaching of the Buddha.
He also set an admirable example of establishing strong
friendly relations with the neighbouring kingdoms, the
enduring influence of which can be seen even now,
centuries after his rule.
Vipassana
has been accepted by hundreds of thousands of people
from all religions and social strata all over the world
in the past three decades. However even now, some
people, on hearing about Vipassana, frown and say that
it is Buddhist. I feel great compassion towards such
people. The false propaganda of centuries has spread so
much darkness! Is living a moral life, gaining mastery
over the mind, and purifying the mind by developing
insight the monopoly of only the Buddhists? Is living
such a life unacceptable to others?
Let us brush
away the cobweb of misconceptions about the teaching of
the Buddha. He investigated the universal eternal
practical truth before teaching it to householders. Let
us gain mastery over the mind and fill our family life
with happiness, harmony, and contentment, and at the
same time, share this happiness with others. This will
result in an ideal human society. ?
|